Earlier in the month I took a
look at two experts in the world of business plans, Carl Schramm and Chuck
Blakeman. These gentlemen had decidedly different views on how to deal with
business plans, and took into account what they both had to offer. While Carl was
in favor of small business plans, Chuck said that there is no need to have one.
With both these points of views,
I decided to try and incorporate them into my business plan. When I had first
drafted my plans, it was extremely long and filled with a lot of redundant
information. After reading what Carl Schramm said, that business plans should
be minimal and sticking to the “who, what, and why” of the plan. Knowing this I
went back and cut out sections that did not seem relevant to what my business
had to offer.
Investors want to see what I have
to offer, how much money it could make, and what I want from them. What I did
was focus mainly on my business and the products I wanted to offer. I narrowed
down my ideas to short paragraphs that explained enough. What that would
accomplish is that a potential investor will get the all the information they
are looking quickly and effectively. I want to keep the investors focused on my
plans while trying not to bore them with useless information.
I wanted to bring their attention
to the products, how much money it can potentially make and what I needed from
them. This included any relevant information on current markets with
informative graphs to show them I did my research. Remember, investors want
someone that knows what they are doing and where they want their business to
go.
As for Chuck Blakeman’s idea of no business
plans, I can see how that could work. However, I feel that I need to establish
myself with a successful business to show investors I have what it takes to
make it. Coming in with no business plan and no experience will probably not
get you any investors. So I think I will wait until I am experienced enough to
show up with no plan at an investor meeting.
No comments:
Post a Comment